Kobe Bryant is the most overrated player of sports in my
lifetime. As a lifelong Laker fan it
pains me to make this point but from a keen sense of justice I have always been
bothered by the enormity of Bryant’s legend.
To be certain he is a terrific player and one of the best to ever join
the Association but not top 10. No way.
Kobe has been one of the best. First, his endurance has been exceptional. Until the last few of these 20 seasons in the
league Kobe was incredibly healthy, which can be attributed to his superior
physical fitness and perhaps also to genetic good fortune. Second, he may have possessed the greatest
pull-up jumper in the history of the game.
Kobe’s versatility is also among the all-time greats.
Kobe’s drawbacks begin with his ego. When he entered the league he was groomed by
many of the game’s greats to be prolific, even the best ever. He had that kind of talent. And that shot was so smooth from day
one. We, (I’ll speak for all Laker fans
here,) all dreamed it, imagined it, and pronounced it as if his destiny was
manifest by the purple and gold “Lakers,” emblazoned across his chest. Never mind the missed three-point shots at
the end of the Kobe’s rookie Lakers’ season-ending loss in the Western
Conference Finals to Malone and Stockton. Kobe averaged 7 points a game and was
not an integral part of the offense or the rotation. He was the future and in many ways he lived
up to the potential. Once the Lakers
brought in Shaq and surrounded the two of them with efficient workmen like
Derek Fisher and Rick Fox and Robert Horry, the threepeat was born.
In the modern NBA every team has a scorer. The Lakers in those years had Shaq who could
literally sink 40 points and gobble up 20 rebounds every night if
necessary. Bryant, however, was the
team’s classic scorer. He averaged 22,
28 and 25 points a game in those three glorious seasons. Kobe’s points may have been easier to come by
than some other scorers around the league based on the attention Shaq drew to the
key. Then again, maybe it was harder to
find those points given the lion’s share Shaq achieved by owning the paint and
putting back everything. In any case he
was more than proficient in his role. I
can’t help but wonder what a garden variety NBA scorer like Alex English might
have achieved if paired with someone of Shaq’s caliber and stature. Or Allen Iverson. Iverson was not the defensive player Kobe was
and he certainly brought a shitload of baggage to his team but as a scorer, he
was more creative and better than Kobe and he honed his skills on a bunch of
otherwise bad teams. Carmelo Anthony may
have had equal success to Kobe with Bryant’s supporting cast. Dwayne Wade achieved at a similar level with
less. Today, around the league there are
several players who will never be considered in Kobe’s class, who carry a
greater burden than Kobe had to on his winning teams, and who achieved more than
Kobe did when his teams were equally inefficient.
Scorers get the recognition in the NBA. Sometimes players like Dennis Rodman or
Joakim Noah are lauded for their yeoman’s role but generally, it is the Derek
Rose’s and the Isiah Thomas’s who are given the credit for wins. This makes sense in as much as scoring is the
single hardest thing there is to do in a basketball game. At the same time they are not just plentiful
in the game at any level, every team has one or two. Kobe led the league in scoring in two of his
19 years. Both of those years the Lakers
departed the playoffs with first round losses.
For those two years, ’05-’06 and ’06-’07, Kobe was one of those scorers
around the league he gets so much credit for being vastly better than. To me he was virtually Carmelo Anthony in
those years, except with good defense.
Kobe also gets a lot of credit for somehow being a smart or
heady player. In fact he was never smart
enough to focus in on his best skill and capitalize on it. He became known as the best bad shot maker in
the game, which is a truth and a manifestation of the fact that he got good at
something that was unadvisable in the first place. More, to say he was good at is a relative
estimation. It is not as if that bad
shot selection yielded better results than other players or than himself when
he got better shots. Had Kobe been a
truly smart player he would have made a living off of taking 1-3 hard steps and
dribbles in either direction then pulling up for the mid-range jumper. That being the shot he did better than
everyone else. Only Jordan was close and
may have exceeded Bryant based on his ability to consistently get more lift on
his jumper making it an easier shot for him.
One more piece of evidence on Kobe’s ego and a bit of conspiracy. First, Kobe gave himself the moniker The
Black Mamba. He said he adopted it as a
means of coping with the turmoil he endured being accused of rape. He got it from a Quentin Tarantino
movie. Who nicknames themselves? That is narcissistic as hell, right? On the conspiracy front I question Kobe’s ability
to speak Italian fluently. It’s been out
there forever that he is fluent having spent a number of years growing up in
Italy while his father played in the Italian professional basketball league but
I have never heard it. We have all heard
him say a few words to somebody but if that is the measure of fluency then I am
fluent in Spanish, Japanese, Portuguese and Armenian. I just don’t trust him. He seems like the type of person to lie about
such a thing. He wants so bad to be the
best ever and thus far the public has cooperated. Also, almost everything he ever says
publicly, every quote, every interview, he reveals the true megalomaniac
within.
I don’t know Kobe.
It’s possible I am all wrong about him.
I have always swam upstream on this one but outside of a playoff run
that led to his 4th title, the counterintuitive
Kobe is the only one I have ever seen. He won the NBA Finals
MVP award when the Lakers won that 5th championship and I was beyond incredulous. Go back and watch that series. Kobe gets his 20+ points per game but his
turnovers were not only abundant, they occurred at the most crucial and
inopportune times. I recall thinking
during some of those crucial turnovers, ‘well, if they win at least Kobe won’t
get the series’ MVP.’ Wrong. If it had been to me I would have nicknamed Kobe 'The Emperor," for obvious reasons.
As for why or how Kobe’s reputation grew to such heroic
proportions, I have fragments of ideas collected and stored over the
years. Yes, we all wanted him to be great,
so we were prone to believe he was achieving it before our eyes over the
years. The Lakers had great success and Kobe
was a part of it if not the overwhelming catalyst he was credited as being. Kobe always talked the talk. From day one he was always intent on creating
that legend. He would say he did not
socialize with other NBA players because he was dedicated to honing his game
and working out but it may just be that he was an asshole and no one was
interested in being friends with him.
Whenever he did seem like he had become friends with someone in the
league the relationship was always characterized as, “Kobe has become something
of a big brother figure to Carmelo.” I
used to imagine the days when years after their careers were over some of these
players would come out and tell the truth about Kobe. I still
wonder if Dwayne Wade or Carmelo Anthony will emerge one day to say they
always felt superior to Kobe and despised him for the cast he had around him
and the success. I also wonder about
Pau. He has always seemed like a heady
sort of guy, in stark contrast to Kobe, and as such I thought he might one day
back off all the lip service praise he has bestowed upon Kobe over the years as
his teammate. When I think about Kobe
complaining to the cops the night he was arrested for rape, about how Shaq would
have had his indiscretion swept under the rug by the authorities, it just seems
appropriate from a karmic standpoint some of these guys would come out and cut
Kobe back down to size a bit. That they have not reveals their bigger nature.
I am a Laker lover.
When I was about 6-years-old I remember the Lakers were a great team and
they had this guy who shot left-handed and always seemed to hit big shots in
crunch time. I was aware of this
behemoth of a man, (unbeknownst to me in the twilight of his career,) Wilt
Chamberlain. I also knew Jerry
West. He was the team’s catalyst. But Gail Goodrich was the guy I identified
with. Other teams could not leave West
or Chamberlain alone and so Goodrich got plenty of good looks at the basket and
he was in his own right a great scorer, (ironically by way of the mid-range
jumper.) A few years later it was Lucius
Allen and Cazzie Russell on mediocre Laker teams. Then Kareem came over and Magic was had in
the draft and the glory years began in earnest.
Five championships in the ‘80s were salad days for Laker fans. Kareem became and remains my favorite player
of all time. Magic was great. His exuberance in action is unparalleled in
sports. James Worthy is vastly
underrated due to the mixed fortune of playing with Buck and Cap. I also loved Rambis and Michael Cooper and
most every Laker. I even liked Nick Van
Exel. When glory returned in the new millennium, I quickly became a Shaq fan,
even though I had not cared for him when he was in Orlando. I also embraced Kobe. In the first 6-7 years of his career I too sang
the faithful refrain. It was when the
debate began about whose team the Lakers were, Shaq’s or Kobe’s, that I first
became dismayed. I remember thinking
geez, I bet Chris Webber and Mike Bibby would be thankful to have Shaq on their
squad and they would not act as if they were somehow on his level. Kobe was never near Shaq in terms of real
impact on basketball games. Shaq was a
pulsating force in the middle of the key who affected everything that happened
at both ends of the court. By comparison
Kobe was merely a good player.
As a Laker fan I loved Robert Horry and I embraced Ron
Harper and Brian Shaw. Along with Ron Artest
later these players hit crucial important shots. Derek Fisher also hit some big shots. By contrast Kobe had a million chances to hit
big shots and hit very few. According to
an article several years ago in Slam Magazine Kobe was statistically among the
worst clutch shot makers in the league.
The cable network Prime Ticket created a show out of Kobe’s 10 greatest
clutch shots. Most of them occurred in
the early season. One or two were in the
same last game of a season and another one was in the 2006 playoffs against
Phoenix. In 19 years and all those playoff
games, given that Kobe has shot the basketball more than anyone to ever play
the game, (the all-time leading misser of shots but well behind Kareem on the
all-time scoring list,) isn’t it shocking he doesn’t have some real big clutch
makes to show for all those attempts? Fisher
has “.4.” Metta Worldpeace made hay of Kobe’s airball and made the layup as time expired in the Finals. (Ron Harper from the baseline against
Portland…Horry top of the key vs. Sacramento…so many big shots come to
mind. Only that one against Phoenix
comes to mind for Kobe and the Lakers lost that first round series and the
Lakers were a bad team, Kobe’s bad team.
Yes, that team was truly his.)
Kobe is and was better than Robert Horry or Derek Fisher. Fisher was a smarter player who used his brain and moxie to perform at a level higher than what might be expected of him physically. Horry landed on several excellent teams that needed another really good, versatile player in their push for championships. He was exceedingly skilled and as cool under fire as could be.
Kobe's legend was fueled by victory and Hollywood, self aggrandizement and folklore. It was built over time by fans who wanted to believe. It is groupthink and it is mostly harmless.
Kobe is and was better than Robert Horry or Derek Fisher. Fisher was a smarter player who used his brain and moxie to perform at a level higher than what might be expected of him physically. Horry landed on several excellent teams that needed another really good, versatile player in their push for championships. He was exceedingly skilled and as cool under fire as could be.
Kobe's legend was fueled by victory and Hollywood, self aggrandizement and folklore. It was built over time by fans who wanted to believe. It is groupthink and it is mostly harmless.
There is not much I like about Kobe. Even on a bad team when he calls a team meeting
to tell the young guys they need to stop complaining and just go find ways to
win, he could not be more tone deaf. He
is shooting 33% from the field, hoisting up way too many three-point shots and
spending disproportionately more time on the court than these young guys while
producing less. As it is Kobe’s legacy is larger than life and for me, larger
than it should be. I am interested to
see if age changes his attitudes and if somehow he finds humility in his gray
years. It could swing my attitude about
him. I mean look, he was involved in a lot
of Laker achievement. I have no
intention of changing my tune but I could see him popping up on an NBA
broadcast and waxing humble for a period of time convincing me of some late-arriving maturity but then who knows how my opinion might evolve. Still, no doubt as of today his reputation is
completely overblown and unjustified.
The odd videos one can find on the internet. So I don't know that these are the top 10 but it is not surprising to me the only two Kobe makes are with a 5-point lead on an ill-advised two-point shot with Grant Hill all over him and one jump shot with plenty of time left in game 7 against the Celtics. In that game it is pretty clear Ron Artest was the clutch shooter and in fact he should have been awarded the series MVP.